铭信是一家专业代写机构，业务包括：新加坡assignment代写、exam代考、新加坡law范文案例分享、新加坡exam代考、论文代写、online exam/quiz代考、网课代考、essay代写、assignment代写、exam代考、网课代修、exam代考、、exam代考、quiz代考、final、midterm、论文润色...
一、法律论文的写作要求
（1）法律论文的首要要求是:
1.所研讨和论说的法学问题,观念正确,对社会主义革命和法制建设有促进作用；
2.能推动法学领域学术理论的研讨向前开展；
3.具有学术论文的诸特征；
4.全文观念与材料一致,层次分明,条理清楚；
5.证明中逻辑紧密,推理正确；
6.所用的法学言语准确、归纳、精粹；
7.文风严肃,就事论理,据理立说,以理立异。
（2）法律论文,一般说来应当具有如下几个特征:
1.学术性,即指论文对法学学术理论问题具有科学的证明性；
2.理论性,即指论文运用充沛占有的材料,经过紧密证明将法学中某个或某几个问题“提高”到理论高度,然后找出带规则性的东西的思辩性。
3.创造性,即指论文论说的法学问题“发前人所未发”,根究法学中前人没有发现的规则或匡正通说的独创性。
4.专业性,即指法学论文对法学学科中的某个或某几个专门问题进行研讨,并取得一定作用,具有供法学专家、教授、学者研讨和沟通的专业性。
Charitable objective of the Trust should be constituted as a special circumstance that constructs the agreement as a licence despite the rule in Street. Lord Hoffmann regarded that the charitable objective of the Trust is irrelevant and there was no distinction among other landlords. Again, Lord Hoffmann did not follow the intention of the Legislation/ Parliament. The Rent Acts and other Landlord and Tenant Acts do make distinctions between different kinds of landlords. In my opinion, the characteristic of charity does prohibit the Trust from granting a tenancy, since providing a temporary accommodation for people in need required a high degree of flexibility. Therefore a charitable trust should only grant licence rather than tenancy. The decision in Street should be distinguished due to these special circumstances.
I think that exclusivity of possession should be judged in an objective basis. All the terms in the agreement and the intention of the parties should be taken into account. Therefore the reservation clause should be interpreted objectively. As it was an express clause, there was strong evidence showing that the Trust intended not to give exclusive possession to Mr. Bruton. Moreover, with the right of entry is reserved by the Trust, it could hardly be concluded that exclusive possession was given to Mr. Bruton.
